Unilever’s sustainability commitments: Can profit and climate goals coexist?

Unilever’s shifting approach to sustainability

Unilever, one of the world’s largest consumer goods companies, has been able to build a reputation for corporate responsibility in the last years. However, recent developments suggest that the company is reassessing its priorities, raising concerns about whether it is scaling back on its ambitious sustainability goals in favor of profitability.

For years, Unilever strategically positioned itself as a leader in sustainable business practices. But amid financial pressures, shareholder demands, and the complexities of implementing large-scale sustainability initiatives, Unilever appears to be scaling back on some of its commitments. This shift raises an important question: Is Unilever refining its sustainability strategy for greater impact, or is it retreating from its position on environmental responsibility?

The Unilever sustainable living plan: A decade of bold promises

In 2010, Unilever launched the Sustainable Living Plan (USLP), a 10-year strategy aimed at achieving three key objectives:

1. Improving health and well-being: Promoting hygiene, nutrition, and sanitation.
2. Reducing environmental impact: Cutting carbon emissions, water use, and waste across its value chain.
3. Enhancing livelihoods: Creating fairer working conditions and sustainable sourcing practices.

This plan was a major step forward in corporate sustainability, positioning Unilever as a frontrunner in integrating environmental and social impact into business strategy. Among its reported successes, Unilever claimed to have helped over a billion people improve their health and well-being and achieved zero non-hazardous waste to landfill across its global manufacturing sites by 2020. Additionally, the company made significant progress in responsible sourcing, with 62% of its agricultural raw materials sustainably sourced.

However, despite these achievements, many of the goals set under the USLP were not fully realised. A Greenpeace report criticized Unilever for failing to make meaningful reductions in plastic waste, while its carbon emissions footprint continued to rise in some areas. These shortcomings highlight the challenge of translating corporate sustainability commitments into measurable, long-term impact.

Scaling back: A shift in priorities

Recently, Unilever have signaled a shift in their sustainability strategy. Faced with mounting pressure from investors to improve financial performance, the company has restructured their approach - reducing sustainability targets and extending deadlines for key environmental initiatives.

According to Unilever, the decision to scale back is not an abandonment of sustainability, but rather a focus on fewer, more impactful priorities. The company has now streamlined its sustainability agenda into four core commitments.

1. Climate action: Reducing greenhouse gas emissions and transitioning to renewable energy.
2. Protecting and regenerating nature: Addressing deforestation and biodiversity loss.
3. Waste reduction (particularly plastics): Cutting single-use plastic and improving circular economy practices.
4. Improving livelihoods: Enhancing labor conditions and fair trade practices.

While Unilever argues that this refined focus will lead to greater efficiency and tangible results, critics see it as a step backward. The Guardian reported that Unilever has quietly relaxed some of its plastic reduction targets and extended timelines for sustainable packaging commitments. This retreat, particularly on plastic waste, is seen as concerning given Unilever’s status as one of the world’s largest producers of plastic packaging.

Additionally, Unilever’s revised strategy has come under scrutiny in an ongoing greenwashing investigation in the UK. The company’s environmental claims, particularly regarding its use of sustainable materials, are facing increased regulatory examination. These developments raise doubts about whether Unilever’s commitment to sustainability is as strong as it claimed.

Let’s have a look at the company’s strategy: progress vs. roadblocks

Unilever’s sustainability journey has been a mix of ambition, progress, and significant roadblocks. While the company has introduced numerous initiatives aimed at reducing its environmental footprint and improving social responsibility, challenges such as plastic pollution, emissions reduction, and supply chain complexities have hindered its ability to meet many of its goals. As Unilever shifts toward a more focused approach, the question remains: Is the company making sustainability a priority, or is financial pressure pushing it to scale back its commitments?

Is Unilever’s current sustainability commitment a more focused approach?

With the Unilever Sustainable Living Plan (USLP) officially retired, the company’s new sustainability strategy focuses on four core areas: climate action, protecting nature, waste reduction, and improving livelihoods. While Unilever claims this shift will lead to greater efficiency and real-world impact, a closer look reveals that the company has relaxed or extended key environmental targets, particularly regarding plastic usage and packaging waste.

For instance, Unilever had previously pledged to halve its use of virgin plastic by 2025, but it now acknowledges that it will likely miss this target. The company has subtly shifted its focus toward “plastic reduction through innovation” rather than concrete usage cuts. According to Greenpeace, this backtracking raises concerns about whether Unilever is truly committed to addressing its massive plastic footprint or merely repackaging its sustainability efforts to appease investors.

Similarly, Unilever’s commitment to net zero by 2039 has faced criticism due to rising emissions across its operations. Despite its sustainability commitments, Unilever has struggled to reduce its overall carbon footprint. In 2021, the company reported total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of approximately 61.72 million tonnes of CO₂ equivalents, with 98.2% of these emissions stemming from Scope 3 activities, such as raw material sourcing, packaging, and product use by consumers.

By 2023, emissions from raw materials, ingredients, and packaging alone accounted for 63% of Unilever's total carbon footprint, highlighting the significant environmental impact of its supply chain. While Unilever has made progress in transitioning its production facilities to 100% renewable grid electricity, these efforts have not been sufficient to offset emissions generated throughout its value chain.

To meet its net-zero by 2039 commitment, Unilever must accelerate its decarbonization strategy, focusing on supplier engagement, sustainable ingredient sourcing, and circular packaging solutions. Without a more aggressive emissions reduction plan, the company risks falling short of its climate goals while facing increasing scrutiny from investors, regulators, and consumers.

Plastic pollution: Is Unilever doing enough to fix the problem?

Unilever has long positioned itself as a “leader” in reducing plastic waste, with commitments to reduce its virgin plastic footprint by 30% by 2026 and transition to fully recyclable, reusable, or compostable packaging. However, despite these ambitious targets, the company has struggled to make meaningful progress, leading to scaled-back commitments and extended timelines.

An investigation revealed that Unilever failed to meaningfully reduce plastic production and continued to rely on problematic materials that are difficult to recycle. A UK regulatory body has launched a greenwashing investigation into Unilever’s claims about its plastic reduction efforts, questioning whether the company has overstated its progress in sustainability marketing.

While Unilever has made efforts to innovate in sustainable packaging, its recent decision to scale back environmental commitments raises doubts about its long-term commitment to tackling plastic pollution. If Unilever is to truly lead in this space, it must go beyond PR-friendly initiatives and implement systemic changes across its product lines and supply chain.

The hidden challenges of Unilever’s supply chain: what’s really happening?

Another major challenge Unilever faces is ensuring sustainability and ethical practices across its complex global supply chain. The company sources raw materials like palm oil, tea, and cocoa from thousands of suppliers worldwide, making supply chain transparency a significant issue.

Despite claims that 99% of its palm oil is sustainably sourced, investigations have raised serious concerns about deforestation, biodiversity loss, and unethical labor practices in its supply chain. A 2016 report by Amnesty International highlighted that Unilever's palm oil supplier, Wilmar International, profited from child labor and forced labor, with workers facing extortion, threats, and severe injuries from banned chemicals. Additionally, in 2008, Greenpeace UK criticized Unilever for buying palm oil from suppliers that were damaging Indonesia's rainforests, contributing to rapid deforestation and greenhouse gas emissions.

These findings suggest that Unilever's supply chain management has not fully addressed environmental and ethical concerns, indicating a need for more stringent oversight and accountability measures.

Balancing sustainability and profitability: Can Unilever get it right?

The tension between sustainability and profitability is at the core of Unilever’s current dilemma. While the company puts a lot of marketing effort into looking like an ESG leader, it also faces intense pressure from investors to improve financial performance.

The company has emphasized the need to scale back sustainability efforts that do not drive direct business value, arguing that the company must focus on initiatives that align with its core financial goals. This shift reflects a broader corporate sustainability challenge: how to balance long-term environmental commitments with short-term financial pressures.

One approach that businesses can adopt to balance sustainability with profitability is the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) framework, which emphasizes people, planet, and profit equally. Companies that integrate TBL principles into their operations can drive long-term financial success while maintaining strong ESG commitments.

For Unilever, this balance means ensuring that sustainability is not seen as an added cost but as an investment in long-term business resilience. Key strategies include:

• Setting realistic climate goals with clear accountability mechanisms.
• Embedding sustainability across all business functions, rather than treating it as a separate CSR initiative.
• Ensuring transparency in ESG reporting to maintain stakeholder trust and avoid greenwashing allegations.

So what can other companies learn from Unilever?

While Unilever’s sustainability strategy has faced setbacks, its efforts provide valuable lessons for other global businesses:

1. Transparency matters: Companies must ensure that sustainability claims are backed by real progress. Greenwashing investigations like the one Unilever is facing can severely damage brand credibility.
2. Sustainability must align with business goals: Companies that integrate sustainability into their core operations rather than treating it as a separate initiative are more likely to succeed.
3. Accountability across the supply chain: Ensuring ethical sourcing and environmental responsibility across all suppliers and production partners is crucial for long-term success.

Unilever’s journey highlights the challenges of navigating sustainability in a highly competitive market. As the company refines its approach, the question remains: Will Unilever find a way to lead in sustainability while maintaining financial performance, or will it continue scaling back in favour of short-term profitability?

So what can we conclude from this global business case?

Unilever’s sustainability journey is a case study in corporate ambition clashing with financial realities. While the company has made notable progress in areas like sustainable sourcing and waste reduction, its scaled-back commitments and ongoing environmental challenges highlight the gaps between sustainability pledges and actual impact.

For businesses, Unilever serves as a warning rather than a model, showing that sustainability must be rooted in long-term business strategy, not just PR-friendly targets. Companies that truly want to lead in sustainability must set realistic, measurable goals, ensure transparency, and embed accountability into every aspect of their operations. Sustainability isn’t just about what’s promised -it’s about what’s delivered.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQS)

1. What are Unilever’s four sustainable priorities?

Unilever's revised sustainability strategy focuses on four key areas: climate action, protecting and regenerating nature, waste reduction (particularly plastics), and improving livelihoods.

2. How does Unilever plan to end plastic pollution?

Unilever committed to cutting virgin plastic use by 30% by 2026 and transitioning to fully recyclable, reusable, or compostable packaging. However, slow progress has led to scaled-back targets and extended timelines. A 2023 Greenpeace report found that Unilever missed key milestones, focusing on incremental changes rather than eliminating single-use plastics. Additionally, a UK inquiry questioned whether Unilever's plastic reduction claims were overstated, revealing that some redesigned products contained more plastic than previous versions.

While Unilever has introduced biodegradable packaging and refillable stations, these efforts remain insufficient to curb plastic waste at scale. To truly lead, the company must move beyond PR-friendly initiatives and make systemic changes in its product design and supply chain.

3.  How can companies balance profitability and sustainability?

For companies like Unilever, balancing financial performance with sustainability remains a complex challenge. The company recently scaled back environmental pledges to prioritize profitability, sparking debate on whether sustainability and business success can truly coexist.

To avoid such trade-offs, companies should adopt the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) approach, which equally values people, planet, and profit. Successful businesses integrate sustainability by:

• Setting realistic, data-driven climate targets rather than vague pledges.
• Using ESG reporting and carbon accounting tools to ensure accountability and transparency.
• Engaging stakeholders-investors, regulators, and customers-to align sustainability with market demands.

‍